On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Peter Stuge wrote: > Finally, have you tested how this works with internal-sftp? > > I guess many large scale servers don't use internal-sftp because of > logging requirements as discussed in an older thread but I bet that > internal-sftp is desirable especially when scaling up so make sure > to not neglect it. Thanks. I didn't catch the other thread, but internal-sftp logging should work just fine. e.g. with Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -l verbose -f daemon I see: Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session opened for local user djm from [10.130.80.1] Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: received client version 3 Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: realpath "." Oct 21 16:47:59 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session closed for local user djm from [10.130.80.1] -d _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
