Dear Darren and Damien, Do you like the proposed approach and cmdline option? On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 7:50 AM Damien Miller <djm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > Finally, have you tested how this works with internal-sftp? > > > > I guess many large scale servers don't use internal-sftp because of > > logging requirements as discussed in an older thread but I bet that > > internal-sftp is desirable especially when scaling up so make sure > > to not neglect it. Thanks. > > I didn't catch the other thread, but internal-sftp logging should work > just fine. > > e.g. with > > Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -l verbose -f daemon > > I see: > > Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session opened for local user > djm from [10.130.80.1] > Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: received client version 3 > Oct 21 16:46:22 djm internal-sftp[82167]: realpath "." > Oct 21 16:47:59 djm internal-sftp[82167]: session closed for local user > djm from [10.130.80.1] > > -d > > _______________________________________________ > openssh-unix-dev mailing list > openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev > > -- Dmitry Belyavskiy _______________________________________________ openssh-unix-dev mailing list openssh-unix-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev
