Re: Seeking Assistance with Spin Lock Usage and Resolving Hard LOCKUP Error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 8:39 AM Muni Sekhar <munisekharrms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Linux Kernel Community,
>
> I am reaching out to seek assistance regarding the usage of spin locks
> in the Linux kernel and to address a recurring issue related to hard
> LOCKUP errors that I have encountered during testing.
>

build your kernel with LOCKDEP everything ?


> Recently, I developed a small kernel module that involves ISR handling
> and utilizes the spinlock_t primitive. In my module, I have employed
> spin locks both in process context using spin_lock() and spin_unlock()
> APIs, as well as in ISR context using spin_lock_irqsave() and
> spin_unlock_irqrestore() APIs.
>
> Here is a brief overview of how I have implemented spin locks in my module:
>

I certainly dont know whether the above and below are legal.
Id be comparing my usage to working examples from the source-code.

and you didnt say anything about your module or what it does.
(fwiw, you'd get more help if it were "our" module, ie gpl'd)



> However, during testing, I have encountered a scenario where a hard
> LOCKUP (NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 2) error
> occurs, specifically when a process context code execution triggers
> the spin_lock() function and is preempted by an interrupt that enters
> the ISR context and encounters the spin_lock_irqsave() function. This
> situation leads to the CPU being stuck indefinitely.
>

Id build w/o watchdog, to see what else goes wrong.
2 different errors might help find common cause.



> My primary concern is to understand the appropriate usage of spin
> locks in both process and ISR contexts to avoid such hard LOCKUP
> errors. I am seeking clarification on the following points:
>

Documentation/locking/hwspinlock.rst

>     Is it safe to use spin_lock_irqsave() and spin_unlock_irqrestore()
> APIs in ISR context and spin_lock() and spin_unlock() APIs in process
> context simultaneously?
>     In scenarios where a process context code execution is preempted
> by an interrupt and enters ISR context, how should spin locks be used
> to prevent hard LOCKUP errors?
>     Are there any specific guidelines or best practices for using spin
> locks in scenarios involving both process and ISR contexts?
>
> I would greatly appreciate any insights, guidance, or suggestions from
> the experienced members of the Linux kernel community to help address
> this issue and ensure the correct and efficient usage of spin locks in
> my kernel module.
>
> Thank you very much for your time and assistance.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]

  Powered by Linux