Re: A confusion in kernel module concepts and a problem case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/6/20 Shaz <shazalive@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> > If a kernel code requires an external loadable module then will it get
>> > loaded automatically?
>>
>> Yes it will be, after you install a module, depmod is run which
>> generates a file called modules.dep . modules.dep lists all
>> dependencies for every module. These dependencies are then
>> automatically  loaded by modprobe when you try to load the actual
>> module.
>>
>
> Actually the kernel code that I am replacing with my module initializes
> earlier at kernel load and starts functioning and if my module is not
> available at that time than it will crash or do something which I don't want
> it to do.
>
>>
>> > If the code requires the kernel module much earlier
>> > than the filesystem is loaded and the module is made available than I
>> > should
>> > provide it earlier. This should require to make the external module be
>> > part
>> > of the kernel. So how might I do this?
>>
>> First of all, is the code going to be used again after it is used
>> once? If not, then it is probably a better idea to include the kernel
>> module in an initial ram disk (initrd). This solves both the problems
>> - of loading a kernel module before the FS module on which it resides
>> is loaded, and at the same time not being forced to include the module
>> within the kernel itself.
>>
>
> So will the initrd based solution be effective because initrd is loaded by
> boot-loader and then the kernel uses it. Is there some way to keep on hold
> the kernel code till my module is loaded if this is not effective?
why not compile your module into kernel?
>
> Else I need to make my module part of the kernel. Do I need to change the
> Makefiles for this apart from adding and connecting the Kconfigs? Noth
> external and internal modules use kbuild so the Makefile should not be a
> problem theoretically. But I am trying it since last night and it seems the
> Makefile needs to be changed. The recursive nature might be giving problem
> but the code does not get compiled at all!
>
>
> --
> Shaz
>
>



-- 
Best Regards
Lin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with
"unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux