On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:45:07PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > that works fine if you're defining a single spinlock, but what do you > do in cases like this: > > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c: [0 ... (ATOMIC_HASH_SIZE-1)] = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED > > that is, when you're assigning an array of them? you still need some > kind of generic, unnamed spinlock in those circumstances, no? That's a special case for architecture-only code. It's not to be used by drivers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
