On Apr 10 2007 23:46, Milind Arun Choudhary wrote: >"use spin_lock_init instead of SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED" Fact is, we cannot remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED. It's needed for variables outside functions: static spinlock_t foobar = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; >let me know if this is fine .. not for me to comment :) > aerdrv.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c >index db6ad8e..6846fb4 100644 >--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c >+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c >@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static struct aer_rpc* aer_alloc_rpc(struct pcie_device *dev) > * Initialize Root lock access, e_lock, to Root Error Status Reg, > * Root Error ID Reg, and Root error producer/consumer index. > */ >- rpc->e_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; >+ spin_lock_init(&rpc->e_lock); > > rpc->rpd = dev; > INIT_WORK(&rpc->dpc_handler, aer_isr); > > >-- >Milind Arun Choudhary >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Jan -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
