> >but that's where you would use the more explicit > >__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, no? AFAIK, you really can remove the macro > >SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED in its entirety. > > I don't remember LDD speaking about __RAW_*. (And other than not > having looked into the code to date, I don't know the difference.) Don't worry about the __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED stuff, that's obviously not for generic code to use. The right answer (as I said before) is to use DEFINE_SPINLOCK(). - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxx Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
