Re: 2.6.9: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 15:07 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > The fedora kernel doesn't have CONFIG_4KSTACKS at all
> 
> That's what I've heard, but that doesn't explain the error message I get 
> when I try to run insmod:
> 
> Nov 18 18:28:35 sqa-07 kernel: ccil: version magic '2.6.9 SMP 686
> REGPARM gcc-3.4' should be '2.6.9-1.667smp SMP 686 REGPARM 4KSTACKS
> gcc-3.4'
> 
> Notice that it says "4KSTACKS"?

yes but it has no such config option because it is on by default.

> 
> > the exact headers are available in /lib/modules/`uname
> > -r`/build/include, which is the *ONLY* location you should use. (fwiw
> > that is true since RHL 7.0 or so already)
> 
> When I use that location, my driver compiles and loads fine. 
> Interestingly enough, /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/.config is an exact 
> match of /boot/config-2.6.9-1.667smp, and yet when I use 
> /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build, the 4KSTACKS problem goes away.  So 
> whatever source tree is in /usr/src/linux-xxx on Fedora Core 3, there's 
> something wrong with it.

no there is something seriously fucked up in your build process. You
*cannot* use /usr/src/linux-xxx in FC2 or FC3 to build modules, just
like you really shouldn't have done so with FC1, RHL9 or older.
(In fact, fc3 doesn't even ship with a /usr/src/linux anymore)



--
Kernelnewbies: Help each other learn about the Linux kernel.
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/
FAQ:           http://kernelnewbies.org/faq/




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux