><matrix_reloaded18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Actually intervention of schedular comes for kernel threads and not for the use > > level threads. > >Where did you get that notion from? A Microsoft whitepaper on scheduling? > >You then seem to be describing, in reverse, the transition from >userland scheduling to kernelland scheduling of threads. Unless the >world stopped spinning and I missed something weird here, the whole of >the rest of your reply makes no sense :-). I don't understand here what is wrong with my notion. What I said is very clear, the OS can't access user-level thread, right ? so schedular can't schedule them ... I may be missing something, but this point is not wrong... if you can jot down some basic points for a user-level thread, then surely there is only thing at the top, and that's noting but the fact that "OS doesn't know about the user-level threads and thas why it can't schedule them seperately on multiple processors on SMP"... Please tell me where exactly I am wrong... Thanks. Sumit Sharma.
