Re: Linux Firewall Active/Active

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6 November 2014 13:43, Robert Sander <r.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05.11.2014 21:40, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>> I would recommend Debian, corosync + pacemaker.
>
> Keepalived easily outperforms corosync + pacemaker if all you need are
> managed IP addresses and routes in your firewall cluster.

Maybe, but is not the case. He needs squid and other things.

I prefer using corosync + pacemaker better than manually write a bunch
of scripts to manage the HA of services. Is more scalable and robust
from the 'services in HA' point of view.

-- 
Arturo Borrero González
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux