Re: Linux Firewall Active/Active

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5 November 2014 20:15, Ricardo Klein <klein.rfk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I need to build a scenario with 2 linux servers (probably CentOS7)
> acting as active/active firewall servers. What tools should I use?
> I saw some articles with:
>  - conntrackd + keepalived
>  - conntrackd + corosync + pacemaker
>
> But, what is the most used/stable?
>

I would recommend Debian, corosync + pacemaker.

I guess an active-passive cluster will do the job.

Setting up an active-active firewall cluster is very difficult and
presents some challenges hard to face (like proper statefull filtering
in two nodes simultaneously, and a consistent ruleset management
between nodes of the cluster).

-- 
Arturo Borrero González
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux