Re: ipporthash, ipportiphash, ipportnethash problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 2010-10-02 22:54, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>>Well give me a little leeway. It hasn't even been 24 hours since 4.4.
>
>Well, I know you are busy working on the latest nf_conntrack patches
>so... (-;

Am I?

>>What is sad too is that Fedora has had so far no interest (or
>>perhaps just no maintainer) to take it up into the distro.
>
>I won't miss it that as much if I could prepare the rpms myself from
>source (via make with dist-rpm target for example) - I can live with
>that.

Talk Fedora into it and become a maintainer :p

>>You could use the openSUSE Build Service to produce packages for
>>various distributions (including Fedora) and the two archs. It
>>should be possible to include Fedora-specific blocks in the
>>preexisting xtables-addons.spec too.
>
>I have a policy that I built all system-sensitive packages from
>source on one or two of my machines locally, so doing that
>externally isn't really an option for me.

You can put up a local BS instance. Of course, the same prerequisite
as for raw building applies - you need some x86_64 box to begin
building x86_64.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux