Lucas Willian Bocchi ha scritto:
(sorry for late reply, I was so busy)
The documentation, really, is very poor in this question.
well said!
Now, about the hardware: I have, for example: ~#~ ethtool -g eth0
Ring parameters for eth0: Pre-set maximums: RX: 4096 RX
Mini: 0 RX Jumbo: 0 TX: 4096 Current
hardware settings: RX: 256 RX Mini: 0 RX Jumbo: 0
TX: 80
I have the same data here, more or less
My preocupation is: the Shaper (htb, hfsc, etc) use this parameters
in your configuration?
I don't know if directly the shaper or the kernel take advantage of
them, but I can say that I tried to use a low card and the result was
so...miserable. Of course with the same programming.
The programmers have in mind that this buffer can affect the
eficiency of shaper?
I think that the best ml for ask this is directly to lkml.org.
To me, it's very important the precision, because I have clients with
1 or more MB of link and 56, 48 kbps clients too, and I need to have
these in mind.
Sorry, but have you already tried a setup like that? Before starts I try
here, in office, my server and after seen that worked perfect with about
ten clients, I put it in production and now it's shaping perfectly about
1k htb classes!
Michele
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
