Re: ip_conntrack_ftp and non-standard ports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: ip_conntrack_ftp and non-standard ports
From: "Filip Sneppe" <filip.sneppe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 23:42:15 +0200
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <d27cd2010603312028h4fd2531dj62b69e6b01cce962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <442B68CB.10005@xxxxxxxxxxx> <9151ac2a0603301310q19746224yb8d43d26f31a31f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d27cd2010603312028h4fd2531dj62b69e6b01cce962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 4/1/06, ludi <myhapwcforever@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was also told to edit the source of module.
>
No that's not needed (not for any of the conntrack/nat modules I know of).

Regards,
Filip

References:
- ip_conntrack_ftp and non-standard ports
  - From: Brian Capouch
- Re: ip_conntrack_ftp and non-standard ports
  - From: Filip Sneppe
- Re: ip_conntrack_ftp and non-standard ports
  - From: ludi

Prev by Date: Re: It seems I've found why conntrack blocks some packets
Next by Date: Re: It seems I've found why conntrack blocks some packets
Previous by thread: Re: ip_conntrack_ftp and non-standard ports
Next by thread: Real ip's behind Firewall
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux