Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Hervé <herve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
From: Raphael Jacquot <raphael.jacquot@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:44:50 +0100
Cc: netfilter <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <63838.57.66.65.39.1107354736.squirrel@57.66.65.39>
References: <61246.57.66.65.39.1107336931.squirrel@57.66.65.39> <4200A1F3.8030609@imag.fr> <5172.57.66.65.39.1107338261.squirrel@57.66.65.39> <4200AB33.1010308@imag.fr> <1107352680.4916.8.camel@hubcap.ljm.dom> <63838.57.66.65.39.1107354736.squirrel@57.66.65.39>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050109 Fedora/1.7.5-3

Hervé wrote:


In my case, the point is to help the routing by modifying the source
address. For example, you give eth0 two addresses: 192.168.100.1 and
192.168.101.1, and eth1: 192.168.100.1 (yes, the same) and 192.168.102.1.


what's the point ???

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
  - From: Hervé

References:
- Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
  - From: Hervé
- Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
  - From: Raphael Jacquot
- Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
  - From: Raphael Jacquot
- Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
  - From: Jason Opperisano
- Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
  - From: Hervé

Prev by Date: Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
Next by Date: Fw: Upgrading kernel 2.4.26 cuts out DNAT --to rules.....!!??
Previous by thread: Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
Next by thread: Re: Two NICS with same IP and same client IP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]