Re: Adding a flag to a packet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:12:36 +0200,
Someone named Tony Earnshaw <tonye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> tir, 30.03.2004 kl. 22.35 skrev Cody Harris:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > > When the computer sent a response, it just reversed the process.
> > > 
> > > I've chosen the sig on this email especially for you this time :)
> > 
> > Hahaha.
> > 
> > So estentally (SP), i want to  create a "patch" between to physical
> > networks transparently. So as far as the internet network computers
> > (192.168.*.*) are concerned, they're phsically attached. The
> > 192.168.0.* system is actually a different physical site then
> > 192.168.1.*. Just when one sends to the other, it's altered to send
> > accross the net and re-wrote at the other end and it continues on it's
> > marry way.
> > 
> > Get it? lol
> 
> Hmmm ... to my mind you've just made an "unfriend" (uvenn) of one of the
> gentlemen on this mailing list. On each mailing list there are one or
> two gentlemen. These are those whom it is unwise (uklokt) to tangle
> with. Even when one has had one or two.

I don't follow. Why?

> 
> --Tonni
> 
> -- 
> 
> mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl
> http://www.billy.demon.nl
> 
> 


-- 
+------------------+-----------------------------+
| Cody Harris      | --------------------------- |
| ---------------- | --------------------------- |
+------------------+-------+---------------------+---+
| *Sigh*. No key.                                    |
+----------------------------------------------------+


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux