On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:50:40 +0100, Someone named Antony Stone <Antony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 30 March 2004 9:35 pm, Cody Harris wrote: > > > So estentally (SP), i want to create a "patch" between to physical > > networks transparently. So as far as the internet network computers > > (192.168.*.*) are concerned, they're phsically attached. The 192.168.0.* > > system is actually a different physical site then 192.168.1.*. Just when > > one sends to the other, it's altered to send accross the net and re-wrote > > at the other end and it continues on it's marry way. > > Okay. You want a VPN (I use http://www.freeswan.org), a simple IP tunnel > (http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Adv-Routing-HOWTO/lartc.tunnel.ip-ip.html), or > else some clever DNAT rules one end, and SNAT rules the other. So i *can't* simple mark a packet with a flag that the other one can see? What if i change the ttl to something like 1000 and match it with a rule on the other end (too weed out any other instances of this). > > Regards, > > Antony. > -- +------------------+-----------------------------+ | Cody Harris | --------------------------- | | ---------------- | --------------------------- | +------------------+-------+---------------------+---+ | *Sigh*. No key. | +----------------------------------------------------+
