On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 07:30:23AM -0700, Tom Marshall wrote: > Thank you. > > I am interested in getting the module into the mainline kernel. I believe > this is where the majority of users are. I have not and will not use p-o-m. > I will convert the patch to use kernel coding standards if someone would > sponsor the change to the 2.4 kernel, but any changes necessary to use p-o-m > will need to be done by someone else because I have zero interest. It is not a change of the actual code, it's just a different formatting for the patch. And as you want to get it into the mainline kernel, you will have to submit it to the netfilter maintainer(s), which is the netfilter coreteam (us). And we prefer patch-o-matic format, since this is the opportunity to have the code being tested for some time, until we conclude that it is safe to submit it to the mainline kernel. Of course you are free to submit in any form, it would just make our work easier if it was p-o-m. I think we already receive 95% of the contributions in this format. > Well, no feedback so far at all so I have left the code alone for the > moment. I'm sure you are familiar with the phenomenon. ;-) yes, indeed :) -- - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/ ============================================================================ "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Attachment:
pgp00450.pgp
Description: PGP signature
