RE: module performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If you can't load modules it takes away one way that someone could
install a LKM or trojan on the machine.

Dan

On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 14:47, Khanh Tran wrote:
> Thanks for the insight.  I didn't think it should affect the performance.
> As far as security goes for dynamically loaded modules, are you talking
> about someone getting at the modules from the local file system?
> 
> Khanh Tran
> Network Operations
> Sarah Lawrence College
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Wittenberg [mailto:daniel-wittenberg@starken.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 3:05 PM
> To: Khanh Tran
> Subject: Re: module performance
> 
> 
> Linux kernel modules are not supposed to suffer any performance
> difference when loaded dynamically or statically.  It applies to any
> module (because of the way they are loaded), so you are good just doing
> the modules.  Using statically built kernel's without module support is
> better for security, but a PITA to upgrade.
> 
> Dan




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux