Consequences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There have been a number of problems that I have but I believed
it had nothing to do with syntax errors or any missing rules on 
my behalf.
I'll have to sit back and study these problems taking into
consideration you recommendations ( and Ken's).
How far reaching I not sure yet but I will say that I have conflicting
chains-> different userdefined chains, default policy of DROP
(INPUT/OUTPUT/FORWARD/POST-PRE ROUTING/ MANGLE ) drops everything
as expected and remains dropping everthing eventhough I have the service
exlicitly and carefully enabled are just some of these problems.

I don't know what's causing them because, as I have indicated, syntax &
everthing else is fine.  Ofcourse because I don't know I'm looking for a
possible scapegoat and initialisation + ifconfig stuff is one thing I
haven't comes to terms with yet -> so hence my suspicion that other
things could've been affected by this.

Let you know though when I figure it out.  Personally I want to finish
it before my summer break -> then its back to uni.

Santos


On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 02:09, Andre Costa wrote:
> You're welcome, Santos, I am glad I could be of help =)
> 
> I am curious: what kind of "far-reaching consequences"? Could you
> please ellaborate?
> 
> Happy firewalling ;)
> 
> Andre
> 
> On 04 Feb 2003 01:58:35 +1100
> saint <nagajuna@optushome.com.au> wrote:
> 
> > I think I get it and I think you've just solve a nagging
> > problem that I have.  I have wrote my own script, took me awhile
> > though.
> > 
> > And I think it does have (have been) some far-reaching consequences.
> > 
> > Thanks again.
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 01:44, Andre Costa wrote:
> > > Hi Santos,
> > > 
> > > there has been a discussion about this a while ago on this ML, I am
> > > forwarding you the msg which has a nice proposal to solve this.
> > > Basically it involves:
> > > 
> > > * writing your own fw script (e.g. your rc.firewall)
> > > 
> > > * put a symlink to it on /etc/init.d *BEFORE* the iptables link
> > > there, so that your script is called first (this means prepeding the
> > > symlink name with a 'S-number' lower than the one associated to
> > > iptables startup script)
> > > 
> > > Please notice that you might have to remove the initialization part
> > > of/etc/sysconfig/iptables and put it at the beginning of your
> > > rc.firewall script, otherwise iptables-restore might choke or you
> > > might even undo what you have done on rc.firewall (these are wild
> > > guesses, make sure you test it properly). I am talking about all
> > > rules like
> > > 
> > > *filter
> > > :FORWARD DROP [0:0]
> > > :INPUT DROP [0:0]
> > > :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> > > 
> > > at the top of /etc/sysconfig/iptables
> > > 
> > > HTH
> > > 
> > > Andre
> > > 
> > > On 04 Feb 2003 01:16:37 +1100
> > > saint <nagajuna@optushome.com.au> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Thank Andre:  that's makes sense. So what on Earth do I do
> > > > when my firewall reboots and I can't be sure of the IP address?
> > > > Could I put the rc.firewall script in /etc/rc.d/ ? and have run at
> > > > boot time from /etc/init.d/ ? 
> > > > I'm using SuSE 8.1 and I can actually put a line in
> > > > /etc/init.d/boot.local that will execute my rc.firewall.
> > > > 
> > > > Santo.
> > > > Happy to learn.
> > 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux