Re: Doing Bridge with firewalling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ranjeet Shetye (ranjeet.shetye@zultys.com) wrote:
> I think I got it right :D.

Unfortunately not quite.

> Hence when you downsize your (layer 3) router into a (layer 2) bridge,
> your neo-bridge becomes a layer 2 entity and disappears from the layer 3
> i.e. it is no longer visible at layer 3. Therefore no firewalling, no
> NAT.

See, this isn't entirely correct.  A bridge passes around ethernet
frames, yes, *but* that does *NOT* mean that it can't modify those
frames.  It can, in fact, modify those frames for NATing purposes.
It can also do full state-based firewalling by watching the frames go by
and doing exactly what netfilter does today.

There's also an eptables or some such out there for filtering based on
raw ethernet frames but basically everything in iptables will work too
with the right patches.  The only thing that won't is MASQ because your
ethernet interfaces don't have an IP address for MASQ to use, *however*,
you *CAN* to SNAT/DNAT/etc.

	Stephen

Attachment: pgp00238.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux