On Mon, 4 May 2015, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:48:09PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Current code makes the assumption that !defined(__GLIBC__) means libc5 > > > which is very unlikely the case nowadays. > > > > > > Fixes compile error because of conflict between kernel and musl headers. > > > --- > > > If libc5 is considered still relevant, I could try to come up with an > > > autoconf test. > > > > I'm all for removing libc5 support if this is whats preventing iptables > > to be built with current non-glibc systems. > > > > Pablo, Patrick, Eric, Jozsef - whats your take on this? > > I would say, go take it. I second that. Best regards, Jozsef - E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
