Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Current code makes the assumption that !defined(__GLIBC__) means libc5 > which is very unlikely the case nowadays. > > Fixes compile error because of conflict between kernel and musl headers. > --- > If libc5 is considered still relevant, I could try to come up with an > autoconf test. I'm all for removing libc5 support if this is whats preventing iptables to be built with current non-glibc systems. Pablo, Patrick, Eric, Jozsef - whats your take on this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
