Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:48:09PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > > > Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Current code makes the assumption that !defined(__GLIBC__) means libc5 > > > > which is very unlikely the case nowadays. > > > > > > > > Fixes compile error because of conflict between kernel and musl headers. > > > > --- > > > > If libc5 is considered still relevant, I could try to come up with an > > > > autoconf test. > > > > > > I'm all for removing libc5 support if this is whats preventing iptables > > > to be built with current non-glibc systems. > > > > > > Pablo, Patrick, Eric, Jozsef - whats your take on this? > > > > I would say, go take it. > > I second that. I've applied this patch, thanks everyone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
