That starts to sounds like the project is run with an uncorrelated
concurrent asynchronous interaction of the manus(es). Suggested anger
management should involve the double-agent maintainer who was bribed to
put iptables in /sbin in the first place.
Should they be in /usr/sbin then?
[bugzilla.gentoo.org/325257]
I just found that out to my cost - need to download the patch, update
my source and rebuild the kernel again, then rinse, repeat with xtables
and hope that it
I wonder. F13 ships with linux-glibc-devel-2.6.33, F14A with -2.6.35. So
where is the actual issue? Nevertheless, I have devised a workaround for
2.6.34 headers. Check out xt-a's
b5e2c7255a87f3d981968e21ea7f88401fe8f8ad and let me know.
On my system it shows glibc-devel-2.12-3 (I don't have linux-glibc-devel).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
