On Thursday 2009-02-12 06:13, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> >> I have the code ready, it is easily mergeable-and-revertible(*) too, but let's >> wait with that because it currently relies on a certain revision of >> Makefile.am (IOW: merge conflicts with nf). >> >> (*) That is, changing it from 'lib_LTLIBRARIES' to 'noinst_LTLIBARIES' and it >> automatically becomes static wrt. the executables again. Oh I love automake :) > > I'd prefer to wait until after the next release with this. I'd rather not want to wait another 4 months with this change [of enabling iptc to be installed]. If Jesper then wants to play with the API, no problem, just don't forget bumping the so_version correctly. > We already have quite a few changes and missed the last release, Maybe releases should be more coordinated. I could come up with a big bunch of suggested guidelines upfront. Release-early-release-often is the one I miss most. .oO( and before I know it, I wrote another book ) >so I want to start stabilizing a nice new release for 2.6.29 soon. Here is your chance to make 1.4.3 nice - it does happen that some projects seem to use libiptc, and because it's not installed with distros because it is noinst_ in our happy Makefile.am, projects do a verbatim copy which a deed worse than having the current API - cherry-steal commit 1715851e now! :-D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
