On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:50:57PM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Phil Rhodes <phil_rhodes <at> rocketmail.com> writes: > > > I haven't the foggiest idea why this (silly) idea is receiving so much > > interest, and yet (critically useful) things like DPX file output get > > overlooked year after year. > > Since the two samples we have work fine: What's wrong with dpx support? _output_ i.e. writing, not reading.
