On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:23:09AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > Hi, James, > > I really don't want send many patches in a seris. But in practise, my > single patch in linux-mips usually be ignored (even they are very > simple and well described).... Then please feel free to reply to the patch and ask if anybody has feedback, stating how important the patch is for you, so it can be prioritised. Resends as part of other series just adds to the noise. > > For example: > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/17723/ Yes, that one needs a proper look. > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/18587/ This one apparently knowingly breaks the feature on other platforms, so can't really be applied as is. I think Matt Redfearn & I were thinking his single IPI stuff could potentially be helpful there too. > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/18682/ You sent that this morning so its hardly had time to be ignored, and I had already spotted it on my phone and intended to apply it today. Also I disagree that "Commit x breaks Loongson64 platforms, so fix it" counts as well described, even if it is simple, and obvious (to me at least) what you're talking about. E.g. a better description would along the lines of: Commit 7a407aa5e0d3 ("MIPS: Push ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO down to platform level") moves the global MIPS ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO select down to various platforms, but doesn't add it to Loongson64 platforms which need it, so add the selects to these platforms too. > > Anyway, thank you for your susggestions, I will rework other patches. Thank you. Cheers James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
