Re: [PATCH V2 00/12] MIPS: Loongson: new features and improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, James,

I really don't want send many patches in a seris. But in practise, my
single patch in linux-mips usually be ignored (even they are very
simple and well described)....

For example:
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/17723/
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/18587/
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/18682/

Anyway, thank you for your susggestions, I will rework other patches.

Huacai

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 7:05 PM, James Hogan <jhogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:12:20AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>> This patchset is prepared for the next 4.16 release for Linux/MIPS. It
>> add Loongson-3A R3.1 support, enable Loongson-3's SFB at runtime, adds
>> "model name" and "CPU MHz" knobs in /proc/cpuinfo which is needed by
>> some userspace tools, adds Loongson-3 kexec/kdump and CPUFreq support,
>> fixes CPU UART irq delivery problem, and introduces WAR_LLSC_MB to
>> improve stability.
>>
>> V1 -> V2:
>> 1, Add Loongson-3A R3.1 basic support.
>> 2, Fix CPU UART irq delivery problem.
>> 3, Improve code and descriptions (Thank James Hogan).
>> 4, Sync the code to upstream.
>
> I few general suggestions that I hope will help you to get your patches
> applied quicker:
>
> - Please have a separate series for each group of related changes in
>   future. It makes them more manageable, makes dependencies clearer, and
>   avoids unchanged resends of unrelated patches when you respin the
>   whole series. Series are mainly to group tightly related patches, or
>   because of dependencies of later patches on earlier ones (and even if
>   you have a series of 30 dependent patches, you can still sometimes
>   split it into groups and mention in the cover letters which other
>   pending series each series depends on).
>
> - More importantly, avoid moving patches between series or adding
>   unrelated patches to a series if possible (so probably best not to
>   split this series now). It makes it harder to see what has changed,
>   whether past feedback has been addressed, and whether new/removed
>   patches are new/abandoned or simply moved from/to a different series.
>
> - Please don't resend a series without changes, ping it if you are
>   concerned. It clutters patchwork for no good reason and makes it
>   harder to see if past feedback has been addressed.
>
> - Please run checkpatch on all patches before submission, and fix any
>   reasonable warnings and errors (i.e. there are various lines exceeding
>   80 characters in this series which should be split, but some are
>   acceptable where its to keep a string together).
>
> - Please include Fixes tags where appropriate, especially where you've
>   Cc'd stable.
>
> - If you Cc stable, please state how far back it should be backported
>   wherever possible,
>   E.g. Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.14+
>   This may help finding what version a commit is first included in:
>   https://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2017-07/msg00149.html
>
> - Please run get_maintainer.pl on each patch to make sure you cc the
>   appropriate maintainers and lists (and Cc them on the cover letter
>   too). Its fine to skip LKML for lots of MIPS patches, but don't miss
>   out the appropriate subsystem maintainers and lists for patches
>   touching drivers/ or they'll never get acked and never get applied.
>
> - Split arch/mips/ and drivers/ patches wherever possible.
>
> Cheers
> James


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux