On 27/02/2018 at 22:01:37 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: > On 16 January 2018 at 11:12, Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add a device tree include file for the Microsemi Ocelot SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/Makefile | 4 ++ > > arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/Makefile > > create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi > > > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile > > index e2c6f131c8eb..1e79cab8e269 100644 > > --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/Makefile > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ subdir-y += cavium-octeon > > subdir-y += img > > subdir-y += ingenic > > subdir-y += lantiq > > +subdir-y += mscc > > subdir-y += mti > > subdir-y += netlogic > > subdir-y += ni > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/Makefile b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/Makefile > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..f0a155a74e02 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/Makefile > > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > > +obj-y += $(patsubst %.dtb, %.dtb.o, $(dtb-y)) > > + > > +# Force kbuild to make empty built-in.o if necessary > > +obj- += dummy.o > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..b2f936e1fbb9 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi > > @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */ > > +/* Copyright (c) 2017 Microsemi Corporation */ > > + > > +/ { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + compatible = "mscc,ocelot"; > > + > > + cpus { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + mips-hpt-frequency = <250000000>; > > + > > + cpu@0 { > > + compatible = "mscc,ocelot"; > > You are using the same compatible string for the whole chip as well as > the cpu core of it, this doesn't seem right. > > Also is this really a custom cpu core? Your product brief suggests > this is a "normal" 24KEc MIPS CPU, at least for ocelot-10 (VSC7514). > So something like "mips,mips24KEc" might be more appropriate here. > Indeed, that is something I forgot to change before sending. > > Regards > Jonas -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com