Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 11:45:37PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:47:12 +0000 (GMT), "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  I have BUILD_ELF64 enabled for my SWARM configuration and I do not plan 
> > to change it.  If there is a bug in the definition of __pa_page_offset() 
> > for such a setup it should be fixed indeed.
> 
> Though I do not object to remove "&& !defined(CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64)"
> from __pa_page_offset(), are there any point of CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64=y
> if your load address was CKSEG0?

Code in CKSEG0 allows shorter a shorter code sequence for address loads.
Yet some machines such as IP27 require 64-bit ELF for booting.

  Ralf


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux