Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/29/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:59:37AM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
> In my understanding, if your kernel is linked at 0xffffffff80xxxxxx,
> you shouldn't have CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 set.

What Maciej said.  But also: please compare the description of
CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 with the targets that link at that address.
Almost every supported target links at that address, except for
IP27.  How do any of them work today?


Surely because none of them define CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64:

       $ git grep BUILD_ELF arch/mips/configs
       arch/mips/configs/bigsur_defconfig:# CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is not set
       arch/mips/configs/ip27_defconfig:# CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is not set
       arch/mips/configs/ip32_defconfig:# CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is not set
       arch/mips/configs/ocelot_c_defconfig:# CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is not set
       arch/mips/configs/ocelot_g_defconfig:# CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is not set
       arch/mips/configs/sb1250-swarm_defconfig:# CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 is not set

--
              Franck


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux