Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <dan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:59:37 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Atsushi Nemoto" <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20070128180807.GA18890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070128180807.GA18890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,

On 1/28/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The problem is __pa_symbol(&_end); the kernel is linked at
0xffffffff80xxxxxx, so subtracting a PAGE_OFFSET of 0xa800000000000000
does not do anything useful to this address at all.


In my understanding, if your kernel is linked at 0xffffffff80xxxxxx,
you shouldn't have CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 set.

--
              Franck

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki

References:
- RFC: Sentosa boot fix
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known regressions with patches
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known regressions with patches
Previous by thread: RFC: Sentosa boot fix
Next by thread: Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux