Jonathan, I know PAN; however, I had no problems using my Razr phone (Motorola) and Bluetooth to connect my N800 to the Internet. So I don't think my issue is a DUN vs. PAN issue. I think the issue is on the phone side. The N800 is paired with the Black Jack 2, it just can't connect. The Bluetooth symbol on the N800 briefly changes then the connection drops. In looking at the N800 phone section in the control panel, the Black Jack 2 has only one supported profile (OPP) while the Razr had three although I didn't write them down before I erased the Razr connection from the N800. I'm wondering (haven't done the research yet, still recovering from the trip) if the OPP profile is the limiting factor, e.g. I'm missing a supported profile in order to make it work. Thanks! Nick. -----Original Message----- From: jonathangreene@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:jonathangreene@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greene Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 17:52 To: Dr. Nicholas Shaw Cc: Mike Lococo; Kevin T. Neely; maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Cell Phone As Modem Nick - It's a DUN vs PAN thing ... WinMo killed off DUN in favor of PAN connectivity. You need to install something (prior email with links) on the tablet to get it going. On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Dr. Nicholas Shaw <Doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > All, > > I have the 10MB plan and connection via Bluetooth worked with my Razr. What > I'm interested in knowing is if anyone has connected to the Internet, via > Bluetooth, with either the Black Jack II or Moto Q. I have the Black Jack > II and it doesn't work and AT&T doesn't believe it will work. They want to > give me a Moto Q but I'm trying to verify if anyone has done this with the > Moto Q before going ahead. If, as has been suggested (and I've experienced > before), AT&T technical support is wrong, then I just need to know how they > do it. :-) > Thanks, > > Nick. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: maemo-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:maemo-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Mike Lococo > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 14:46 > To: Kevin T. Neely > Cc: Dr. Nicholas Shaw; maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Cell Phone As Modem > >> Kevin T. Neely wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:09:07PM +0300, Sameer Verma wrote: >>> Dr. Nicholas Shaw wrote: service would keep telling me that I could >>> not use Bluetooth because I had not purchased the "tethering >>> package". >> >> The what? I'm sorry, that's just funny. I don't think I've ever >> heard of anything like that. You either have a data plan or you >> don't. Either way, if your phone is capable, you should be able to >> tether to it. > > It would be funny if it weren't true. Several providers hamstring their > handsets to prevent tethering unless you sign up for it as an added > feature. Verizon has bee doing this for years, I don't have experience > with AT&T but it wouldn't surprise me. Verizon calls it Broadband > Access, it's an extra $15/month. > > If you do successfully workaround the block and tether your phone > without the feature, you're in violation of your TOS. > > Thanks, > Mike Lococo > _______________________________________________ > maemo-users mailing list > maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-users mailing list > maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users > -- Jonathan Greene +1.914.750.8740 AIM / iChat - atmasphere gtalk / jabber - jonathangreene@xxxxxxxxx Skype / Gizmo - JonathanGreene blogs - http://www.atmasphere.net/wp / http://www.maemoapps.com _______________________________________________ maemo-users mailing list maemo-users@xxxxxxxxx https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
