Hi, ext Neil MacLeod wrote: > Igor Stoppa wrote: >>>>>> n800: 18 days >>>>>> n810: 27 days >>>>> Impressive, any details where the savings were done? Is this strictly HW >>>>> related and the n800 has same OS2008 version as N810? >>>> it's both hw and sw; the sw part is about fixing wrong settings in muxing, >>>> pullup&pulldown and disabling voltage regulators when not in use or OMAP >>>> is in retention. >>> Just to confirm, these 18 days are already on N800 with OS2008 and with >>> those sw issues fixed? >> I don't remember if i checked exactly the sw version that is public atm >> but if it wasn't then it was close enough. > > I can't imagine those fixes are in the current software, or anything close > to them as a few weeks ago I performed an idle run-down test on an N800 with > 2.2007.50-2 (a freshly flashed device with no configuration changes whatsoever, I.e. you didn't restore a backup, configure a phone nor WLAN? > so essentially a factory fresh install with a fully charged battery). After 12 > days and 2 hours[1] the low battery alarm began to sound - that is just 2/3rds > of what you are saying is possible so why such a large discrepancy Igor, the 18 day number, is that until the device (is calculated to) shut itself down, or until there's the low battery warning? > could my 9 month old N800 battery really have lost 1/3rd of it's > capacity? And you verified that it really was the original N800 battery and charger? (I sometimes use the 770 ones, but I think its battery has smaller capacity) > Or can this difference really be down to component variance (the tested N800 > is from March 2007)? > > 1. https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2602#c20 - Eero
