Re: Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/04/2017 12:17, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Unmount of thin-pool has been dropped from upstream version >169.
It's now delegated to user script executed on % checkpoints
(see 'man dmeventd')

Hi Zdenek,
I missed that; thanks.

Any thoughts on the original question? For snapshot with relatively big CoW table, from a stability standpoint, how do you feel about classical vs thin-pool snapshot?

Regards.

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux