Re: Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 07-04-2017 15:50 L A Walsh ha scritto:
Gionatan Danti wrote:
I more concerned about lenghtly snapshot activation due to a big, linear CoW table that must be read completely...
---
   What is 'big'?  Are you just worried about the IO time?
If that's the case, much will depend on your HW.  Are we talking
using 8T hard disks concatenated into a single volume, or in a
RAID1, or what?  W/a HW-RAID10 getting over 1GB/s isn't
difficult for a contiguous read.  So how big is the CoW table
and how fragmented is it?  Even w/fragments, with enough spindles
you could still, likely, get enough I/O Ops where I/O speed shouldn't
be a critical bottleneck...

For the logical volume itself, I target a 8+ TB size. However, what worries me is *not* LV size by itself (I know that LVM can be used on volume much bigger than that), rather the snapshot CoW table. In short, from reading this list and from first-hand testing, big snapshots (20+ GB) require lenghtly activation, due to inefficiency in how classic metadata (ie: non thinly-provided) are layed out/used. However, I read that this was somewhat addressed lately. Do you have any insight?

--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux