On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 03:41:35PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > I'll test Mark's two patches on my system and let you know the results. > After looking some more into it, those _may_ actually fix the problem at least > for systems supporting ACPI. No promise, though, and I am not sure if that > would be sufficient (it may still not work on non-ACPI PCs). But then who They should fix ACPI systems, if they don't we need to fix them further - that case should just work, it was an oversight not to have a patch like the ACPI one in already. I'm not sure how many non-ACPI PCs still exist, we're definitely talking about things over 10 years old (even before PCs became ACPI only they started to have ACPI present which should be sufficient). Jean, I'm doing a writeup but it's probably not going to be done today.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
