On 01/26/2014 04:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:04:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> I think I have a better idea: Surround the regulator code, or at least
>> its error handling, in the lm90 driver with
>
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
>> }
>
>> Would that be ok ? If yes I'll submit a patch. I'll do the same in
>> another driver I am working on.
>
> That's not going to have the desired effect in cases where DT is built
> into the kernel but not in use on the current system (which is a
> configuration that gets used) ...
The solution to that particular aspect of the problem is the following:
if (of_have_populated_dt()) {
...
which is a run-time rather than compile-time test.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
