On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:19:24AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/26/2014 04:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:04:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> >> I think I have a better idea: Surround the regulator code, or at least
> >> its error handling, in the lm90 driver with
> >
> >> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
> >> }
> >
> >> Would that be ok ? If yes I'll submit a patch. I'll do the same in
> >> another driver I am working on.
> >
> > That's not going to have the desired effect in cases where DT is built
> > into the kernel but not in use on the current system (which is a
> > configuration that gets used) ...
>
> The solution to that particular aspect of the problem is the following:
>
> if (of_have_populated_dt()) {
> ...
>
Turns out that won't help either after Mark's patches to ACPI and
to the regulator core are applied. Right now I don't have a solution
that would work for all systems.
I'll leave it up to Jean to decide how to proceed.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
