On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:04:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I think I have a better idea: Surround the regulator code, or at least
> its error handling, in the lm90 driver with
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
> }
> Would that be ok ? If yes I'll submit a patch. I'll do the same in
> another driver I am working on.
That's not going to have the desired effect in cases where DT is built
into the kernel but not in use on the current system (which is a
configuration that gets used) and will remove error handling for non-DT
systems that do have regulators set up. There's not the relationship
between this and DT that you seem think there is...
Besides, if we're going to do a bodge like that we should do it in the
core and not in individual callers.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
