On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:27:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:13AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > The problem here is that your i2c bus driver is evil and attributes the > > same name to two different buses. It should not do that. This is a bug > > in the i2c-omap driver. It should give each bus a distinct name, for > > example by including the base I/O address in it. > > Unfortunately it is not the only such driver. > > Same output on P2020: > > i2c-0 i2c MPC adapter I2C adapter > i2c-1 i2c MPC adapter I2C adapter > > And on P5040: > > i2c-0 i2c MPC adapter I2C adapter > i2c-1 i2c MPC adapter I2C adapter > i2c-2 i2c MPC adapter I2C adapter > i2c-3 i2c MPC adapter I2C adapter > > Question is ... would a patch to fix that be accepted by the i2c maintainers ? I think it would, yes, as long as you explain why it is needed. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
