On 04/06/2011 08:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Per,
>
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:29:44PM -0400, Per Dalén wrote:
>> First a big thanks to Guenter Roeck for helping me (allot) to cleanup
>> this driver
>>
>> v3 -> v4:
>> * Removed "data->valid = 0;" (missed that in v3 ;)
>> * only read the limits once
>> * changed the temp_input and temp_high as suggested by Guenter, also
>> changed the functions/macros related to that change
>
>> MAX6642 is a SMBus-Compatible Remote/Local Temperature Sensor with Overtemperature Alarm from Maxim.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Per Dalen <per.dalen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
> Sorry, one more detail I just noticed. More of a question.
>
> [ ... ]
>> +
>> +static struct max6642_data *max6642_update_device(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> + struct max6642_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u16 val, tmp;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> +
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, data->last_updated + HZ * 8) || !data->valid) {
>
> Are you sure you only want to update readings every 8 seconds ?
No, this is wrong from me. Every second, or what do you think?
>
> Also, after spending all this time on this driver (and after falling into
> the same trap last night with another driver ;), it looks like this is really
> just another variant of the lm90, and adding support for max6642 to the lm90
> driver might be quite trivial. Have you considered this ?
Hmmm, ;)
"Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for max6642
On 03/03/2011 08:55 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
With all the differences and lacking registers, I wonder if it would be
better to write a new driver, either based on this driver of based on
the max1619 driver.
Guenter"
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
br
Per
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
