On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:50:28PM -0500, Robert Kaiser wrote: > Guenter Roeck schrieb: > > As it is, I am really much more concerned that I am unable to get an > > Acked-by: for the patch series, much less a Reviewed-by:, nor a Tested-by: > > from anyone but you. That might result in the series not making it into 2.6.39, > > which I think would be unfortunate. > > If I had time, any knowledge of kernel code or even C, and it was easy > to test this (without compiling a kernel myself, and with some nice doc > telling all steps I need), then I'd look into helping there. > But then, right now, all of those factors are lacking, unfortunately - > and my new Intel DH67CL board with something that is probably once of > those chips creates other problems as well (thinking no display is > connected), so sensors are not the most important factor, just a nice > tool to play with... ;-) > This is a Sandy Bridge board, isn't it ? Maybe you can try a kernel from the -next tree; that might solve your problem. That means you would have to download, compile and install the kernel, though. To test a standalone driver, all you have to do is to download it, then run "make" followed by "sudo make install". You don't have to build the entire kernel. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
