Jean, > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:45:16 -0500, Arun Raghavan wrote: >> I recompiled with HZ/10 and I still can't see any resolution when the >> temperature begins to rise - here are two consecutive readings 100ms >> apart: >> >> 0: +29.0°C 1: +24.0°C 2: +24.0°C 8: +27.0°C 9: +19.0°C 10: +26.0°C >> <Begin execution> >> 0: +35.0°C 1: +29.0°C 2: +27.0°C 8: +35.0°C 9: +30.0°C 10: +36.0°C >> >> Any further suggestions? > > You could try HZ/100, just for testing. What's your test protocol, BTW? > I'll try doing my own tests. > HZ/100 didn't give me any differences either. I'm going to try reading the MSR myself and see whether there's intermediate updates. My test programs are from the cpuburn suite. I run 6 of them (one each pinned to a thread). A script monitors the temperature continually (in fixed intervals). Initially the CPUs are kept idle for 2 minutes, then the 6 threads are kicked-off to run for 5 minutes and then the threads are killed off with the temperature being monitored for a further 2 minutes. The fixed interval was 1s in the graph I sent you earlier and brought down to 10ms and 1ms with HZ/10 and HZ/100 versions. Please let me know what your testing protocol is too. thanks, -arun _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
