Hi Joe, On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:08:10 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 07:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > * That being said, now that the hwmon subsystem maintainer is a shared > > > duty between Guenter and myself, there's no single place where we can > > > keep a patch touching many drivers and ensure it doesn't conflict > > > with the changes in the other tree. But I would think this is > > > something for Gunter and myself to sort out, not patch contributors. > > Perhaps allow both maintainers read/write access to hwmon-next? Guenter and myself are collaborating on the hwmon tree since a relatively recent date. We still have to find the best method. For now we have separate trees because it seemed easier that way, but we may change our minds later. > > > I currently have pending patches to the following hwmon drivers in my > > > tree: adt7475, ams, asc7621, hdaps, it87, k8temp, lm75, lm85, lm90, > > > pcf8591, s3c-hwmon, w83795. Two of these are affected by Joe's > > > patch(es). Guenter, what about you? > > > > coretemp, pkgtemp, via-cputemp, ltc4261 (new), lis3, hp_accel > > I did these against next which includes 'hwmon-staging/hwmon-next'. > > Shouldn't these patches apply without modification or do I need > to do something else? If you based your patches on linux-next then you're all set. I was asking Guenter about his affected drivers only to decide who, of him and me, should take which patch. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
