On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 07:46 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > * That being said, now that the hwmon subsystem maintainer is a shared > > duty between Guenter and myself, there's no single place where we can > > keep a patch touching many drivers and ensure it doesn't conflict > > with the changes in the other tree. But I would think this is > > something for Gunter and myself to sort out, not patch contributors. Perhaps allow both maintainers read/write access to hwmon-next? > > I currently have pending patches to the following hwmon drivers in my > > tree: adt7475, ams, asc7621, hdaps, it87, k8temp, lm75, lm85, lm90, > > pcf8591, s3c-hwmon, w83795. Two of these are affected by Joe's > > patch(es). Guenter, what about you? > > > coretemp, pkgtemp, via-cputemp, ltc4261 (new), lis3, hp_accel I did these against next which includes 'hwmon-staging/hwmon-next'. Shouldn't these patches apply without modification or do I need to do something else? _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
