Re: lmsensors doesn't detect core-i7 sensors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/01/2010 10:03 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
 >sudo ./sensors-detect
Yes
Intel Core family thermal sensor... Success!
(driver `coretemp')
...
Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
Just press ENTER to continue:
Driver `it87':
* ISA bus, address 0x290
Chip `ITE IT8720F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
Driver `coretemp':
* Chip `Intel Core family thermal sensor' (confidence: 9)
Do you want to generate /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (yes/NO): y
Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors
for initialization at boot time.
You should now start the lm_sensors service to load the required
kernel modules.
I then copy that file and restart
mahmood@localhost:~$ <mailto:mahmood@blackfish:~$> ls /etc/init.d/lm*
/etc/init.d/lm-sensors
However this is what I see again
mahmood@localhost:~$ <mailto:mahmood@localhost:~$> sudo sensors
it8720-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
in0: +0.86 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in1: +1.58 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in2: +3.39 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in3: +3.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in4: +0.05 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
in5: +3.12 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
in6: +0.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
in7: +2.16 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
Vbat: +3.10 V
fan1: 1638 RPM (min = 10 RPM)
fan2: 618 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan3: 1278 RPM (min = 10 RPM)
fan4: 1203 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
temp1: +35.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
temp2: +25.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
temp3: +33.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +90.0°C) sensor = thermistor
cpu0_vid: +0.313 V
No core-i7.... :(
*// Naderan *Mahmood;*

sudo /etc/init.d/lm_sensors restart



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
*From:* Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx>
*To:* lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Sent:* Wed, September 1, 2010 12:23:10 PM
*Subject:* Re:  lmsensors doesn't detect core-i7 sensors

sudo ./sensors-detect

On 09/01/2010 09:46 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
 > >just svn update # not needed if you have fresh checkout
 > To double check and be sure again:
 > mahmood@localhost:~$ <mailto:mahmood@localhost:~$> svn update 5857
 > Skipped '5857'
 >
 > Then:
 >
 >
 > mahmood@localhost:~$ <mailto:mahmood@blackfish:~$> cd lm-sensors/prog/detect/
 > mahmood@localhost:~/lm-sensors/prog/detect$ <mailto:mahmood@blackfish:~/lm-sensors/prog/detect$> sudo sensors-detect
 > # sensors-detect revision 5818 (2010-01-18 17:22:07 +0100)
 > # System: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P55-USB3
 > This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
 > to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
 > and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
 > unless you know what you're doing.
 > Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.
 > Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): y
 > Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No
 > VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No
 > VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No
 > AMD K8 thermal sensors... No
 > AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No
 > AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No
 > Intel Core family thermal sensor... No
 > Intel Atom thermal sensor... No
 > Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No
 > VIA C7 thermal sensor... No
 > VIA Nano thermal sensor... No
 > Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to
 > standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
 > Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): y
 > Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
 > Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No
 > Trying family `SMSC'... No
 > Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No
 > Trying family `ITE'... Yes
 > Found `ITE IT8720F Super IO Sensors' Success!
 > (address 0x290, driver `it87')
 > Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
 > Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No
 > Trying family `SMSC'... No
 > Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No
 > Trying family `ITE'... No
 > Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces
 > through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.
 > We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it
 > there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such
 > interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI
 > interfaces? (YES/no): y
 > Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0... No
 > Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8... No
 > Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.
 > We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually
 > safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any
 > ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (yes/NO): y
 > Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No
 > Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No
 > Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No
 > Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No
 > Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware
 > monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works
 > reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble
 > on some systems.
 > Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): y
 > Found unknown SMBus adapter 8086:3b30 at 0000:00:1f.3.
 > Sorry, no supported PCI bus adapters found.
 > Module i2c-dev loaded successfully.
 > Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
 > Just press ENTER to continue:
 > Driver `it87':
 > * ISA bus, address 0x290
 > Chip `ITE IT8720F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
 > To load everything that is needed, add this to /etc/modules:
 > #----cut here----
 > # Chip drivers
 > it87
 > #----cut here----
 > If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will
 > contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones!
 > Do you want to add these lines automatically to /etc/modules? (yes/NO)yes
 > Successful!
 > Monitoring programs won't work until the needed modules are
 > loaded. You may want to run '/etc/init.d/module-init-tools start'
 > to load them.
 > Unloading i2c-dev... OK
 >
 > But that didn't help. See the sensors output:
 >
 > mahmood@localhost:~/lm-sensors/prog/detect$ <mailto:mahmood@blackfish:~/lm-sensors/prog/detect$> sudo sensors
 > it8720-isa-0290
 > Adapter: ISA adapter
 > in0: +0.86 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > in1: +1.58 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > in2: +3.39 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > in3: +3.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > in4: +0.05 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
 > in5: +3.12 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > in6: +0.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
 > in7: +2.16 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > Vbat: +3.10 V
 > fan1: 1683 RPM (min = 10 RPM)
 > fan2: 644 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
 > fan3: 1280 RPM (min = 10 RPM)
 > fan4: 1203 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
 > temp1: +35.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
 > temp2: +25.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
 > temp3: +33.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +90.0°C) sensor = thermistor
 > cpu0_vid: +0.313 V
 >
 > Any idea? Thanks,
 > *// Naderan *Mahmood;*
 >
 >
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------
----
--
 > *From:* Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx>>
 > *To:* lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 > *Sent:* Wed, September 1, 2010 12:08:07 PM
 > *Subject:* Re:  lmsensors doesn't detect core-i7 sensors
 >
 > On 09/01/2010 09:30 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
 > > Here is what I did:
 > > mahmood@localhost:~$ <mailto:mahmood@localhost:~$> svn checkout http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk lm-sensors
 > > ...
 > > Checked out revision 5857.
 > Yes
 >
 > > mahmood@localhost:~$ <mailto:mahmood@blackfish:~$> svn update http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk lm-sensors
 > > Skipped 'http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk'
 > > At revision 5857.
 > > Summary of conflicts:
 > > Skipped paths: 1
 > > Is that what you meant?
 > > *// Naderan *Mahmood;*
 > just svn update # not needed if you have fresh checkout
 >
 > in lm-sensors/prog/detect run sensors-detect and it should find your core-i7
 >
 > >
 > >
 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------
--
----
 > --
 > > *From:* Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx>>>
 > > *To:* lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
 > > *Sent:* Wed, September 1, 2010 11:49:03 AM
 > > *Subject:* Re:  lmsensors doesn't detect core-i7 sensors
 > >
 > > On 09/01/2010 08:38 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
 > > > Dear all,
 > > >
 > > > I ran sensors-detect to detect Core-i7 temperatures but it doesn't show them. Here is the output of sensors-detect:
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > mahmood@localhost:~$ sudo sensors-detect
 > > > # sensors-detect revision 5818 (2010-01-18 17:22:07 +0100)
 > > > # System: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P55-USB3
 > > >
 > > > This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
 > > > to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
 > > > and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
 > > > unless you know what you're doing.
 > > >
 > > > Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.
 > > > Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): y
 > > > Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No
 > > > VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No
 > > > VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors... No
 > > > AMD K8 thermal sensors... No
 > > > AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No
 > > > AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No
 > > > Intel Core family thermal sensor... No
 > > > Intel Atom thermal sensor... No
 > > > Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No
 > > > VIA C7 thermal sensor... No
 > > > VIA Nano thermal sensor... No
 > > >
 > > > Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to
 > > > standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
 > > > Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): y
 > > > Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
 > > > Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No
 > > > Trying family `SMSC'... No
 > > > Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No
 > > > Trying family `ITE'... Yes
 > > > Found `ITE IT8720F Super IO Sensors' Success!
 > > > (address 0x290, driver `it87')
 > > > Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
 > > > Trying family `National Semiconductor'... No
 > > > Trying family `SMSC'... No
 > > > Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No
 > > > Trying family `ITE'... No
 > > >
 > > > Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces
 > > > through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.
 > > > We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it
 > > > there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such
 > > > interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI
 > > > interfaces? (YES/no): y
 > > > Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0... No
 > > > Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8... No
 > > >
 > > > Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.
 > > > We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually
 > > > safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any
 > > > ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (yes/NO): y
 > > > Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No
 > > > Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No
 > > > Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No
 > > > Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No
 > > >
 > > > Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware
 > > > monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works
 > > > reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble
 > > > on some systems.
 > > > Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): y
 > > > Found unknown SMBus adapter 8086:3b30 at 0000:00:1f.3.
 > > > Sorry, no supported PCI bus adapters found.
 > > > Module i2c-dev loaded successfully.
 > > >
 > > > Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
 > > > Just press ENTER to continue:
 > > >
 > > > Driver `it87':
 > > > * ISA bus, address 0x290
 > > > Chip `ITE IT8720F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
 > > >
 > > > To load everything that is needed, add this to /etc/modules:
 > > > #----cut here----
 > > > # Chip drivers
 > > > it87
 > > > #----cut here----
 > > > If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will
 > > > contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones!
 > > >
 > > > Do you want to add these lines automatically to /etc/modules? (yes/NO)yes
 > > > Successful!
 > > >
 > > > Monitoring programs won't work until the needed modules are
 > > > loaded. You may want to run '/etc/init.d/module-init-tools start'
 > > > to load them.
 > > >
 > > > Unloading i2c-dev... OK
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > Then I ran sensors:
 > > >
 > > > mahmood@localhost:~$ sudo sensors
 > > > it8720-isa-0290
 > > > Adapter: ISA adapter
 > > > in0: +0.86 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > > > in1: +1.58 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > > > in2: +3.39 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > > > in3: +3.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > > > in4: +0.05 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
 > > > in5: +3.12 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > > > in6: +0.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V) ALARM
 > > > in7: +2.16 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.08 V)
 > > > Vbat: +3.10 V
 > > > fan1: 1679 RPM (min = 10 RPM)
 > > > fan2: 644 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
 > > > fan3: 1278 RPM (min = 10 RPM)
 > > > fan4: 1205 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
 > > > temp1: +36.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
 > > > temp2: +25.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = thermistor
 > > > temp3: +33.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +90.0°C) sensor = thermistor
 > > > cpu0_vid: +0.313 V
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > What can I do then? currently I have kubuntu 10.04
 > > >
 > > > *// Naderan *Mahmood;*
 > > >
 > > >
 > >
 > > Pick sensors-detect from svn or file bug against lm-sensors in ubuntu and maintainer(if he is nice) update lm-sensors.
 > >
 >



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux