On 07/20/2010 10:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:51 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:41:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: >>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and >>>>>> compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output: >>>>>> >>>>>> The module loads fine: >>>>>> >>>>>> # modprobe w83627ehf >>>>>> # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages >>>>>> Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B >>>>>> chip at 0xa10 >>>>>> # sensors >>>>>> w83667hg-isa-0a10 >>>>>> Adapter: ISA adapter >>>>>> in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V) >>>>>> in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM >>>>>> in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM >>>>>> in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM >>>>>> in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM >>>>>> in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V) >>>>>> in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM >>>>>> in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM >>>>>> fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >>>>>> fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM >>>>>> fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >>>>>> fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >>>>>> fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >>>>>> temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor = >>>>>> thermistor >>>>>> temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor >>>>>> temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor >>>>>> cpu0_vid: +0.000 V >>>>>> >>>>> Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off. >>>>> Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured. >>>>> >>>>> Jean, any idea/thoughts ? >>>> >>>> Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm >>>> flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these >>>> are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and >>>> check that all the alarms go away. >>>> >>>> The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but >>>> there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to >>>> ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag >>>> from the right register/bit. >>>> >>> I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips, >>> unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on. >> >> I seem to remember that on some of these chips, in6 and temp3 are >> mutually exclusive? So you may have to check all the configuration >> registers which determine which of in6 or temp3 is enabled. Maybe in6 >> is enabled and the driver wrongfully think temp3 is instead? >> > Yes, I thought about that too. > >> Just a random idea, I may be completely off the track. >> > The detection code seems to be fine - at least I didn't find a problem > with it. Unless, of course, the bit value to enable aux temp monitoring > was reversed in rev B, but the manual doesn't reflect that. > > Guess I _must_ be missing something, but right now I have no idea what > it might be. > > One thought - Tobias, can you provide sensor output from your BIOS for > comparison ? These are all PC Health informations I could find in the BIOS: CPU Temp = 49°C CPUFAN = 1692 RPM Vcore = 1.232V 3VCC = 3.360V VTT 1.1V = 1.120V PCH Voltage = 1.096V IGD Voltage = toggles between 1.176V and 1.184V VSB = 3.280V VBAT = 3.344V The voltages are rather hard to match aren't they? Hope this helps. Regards, Tobias PS: I cannot answer my mails until Sunday. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
