On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:51 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:41:42 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 02:54 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:24:16 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:02:52AM -0400, Tobias Preclik wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > my Zotac board H55-ITX features the W83667HG-B chip. I downloaded and > > > > > compiled the standalone kernel module today. Here's the sensors output: > > > > > > > > > > The module loads fine: > > > > > > > > > > # modprobe w83627ehf > > > > > # tail -n 1 /var/log/messages > > > > > Jul 18 13:42:58 leela kernel: [50378.028634] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG-B > > > > > chip at 0xa10 > > > > > # sensors > > > > > w83667hg-isa-0a10 > > > > > Adapter: ISA adapter > > > > > in0: +0.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V) > > > > > in1: +1.11 V (min = +0.10 V, max = +0.20 V) ALARM > > > > > in2: +3.36 V (min = +3.95 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM > > > > > in3: +3.36 V (min = +1.57 V, max = +2.10 V) ALARM > > > > > in4: +1.10 V (min = +1.74 V, max = +1.87 V) ALARM > > > > > in5: +1.18 V (min = +1.02 V, max = +1.30 V) > > > > > in7: +3.28 V (min = +3.23 V, max = +2.62 V) ALARM > > > > > in8: +3.34 V (min = +3.18 V, max = +0.05 V) ALARM > > > > > fan1: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM > > > > > fan2: 1022 RPM (min = 1638 RPM, div = 8) ALARM > > > > > fan3: 0 RPM (min = 958 RPM, div = 128) ALARM > > > > > fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM > > > > > fan5: 0 RPM (min = 3515 RPM, div = 128) ALARM > > > > > temp1: +30.0°C (high = -56.0°C, hyst = -17.0°C) ALARM sensor = > > > > > thermistor > > > > > temp2: +41.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor > > > > > temp3: -3.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = thermistor > > > > > cpu0_vid: +0.000 V > > > > > > > > > Actual values look mostly good, but the limits are really off. > > > > Difficult to say, though, if those are wrong readings or just badly configured. > > > > > > > > Jean, any idea/thoughts ? > > > > > > Only a register dump would say from sure. But given that the alarm > > > flags all match out-of-limit readings, I would be inclined to say these > > > are only misonconfigured limits. Tobias could set proper limits and > > > check that all the alarms go away. > > > > > > The only inconsistency is with temp3... the reading is out of limit but > > > there is no alarm flag. You may want to double check the datasheet to > > > ensure that the driver reads both the temp3 value and its alarm flag > > > from the right register/bit. > > > > > I checked the specification. Registers are the same for both chips, > > unless I am missing something. No idea what is going on. > > I seem to remember that on some of these chips, in6 and temp3 are > mutually exclusive? So you may have to check all the configuration > registers which determine which of in6 or temp3 is enabled. Maybe in6 > is enabled and the driver wrongfully think temp3 is instead? > Yes, I thought about that too. > Just a random idea, I may be completely off the track. > The detection code seems to be fine - at least I didn't find a problem with it. Unless, of course, the bit value to enable aux temp monitoring was reversed in rev B, but the manual doesn't reflect that. Guess I _must_ be missing something, but right now I have no idea what it might be. One thought - Tobias, can you provide sensor output from your BIOS for comparison ? Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
